Seminary schools are not teaching this and are skirting the truth. Today in many Bible colleges, professors are either in the Alexandrian cult or they are Jesuits or Masons as many Preachers, evangelist, and ministers are also masons. They are constantly altering the King James Bible with the Greek or English versions of the Roman Catholic Latin Vulgate Bible. The book of Thomas, Mary, Enoch, Judas are all frauds that have been manipulated over time to hide the truth of the KJV in subtle ways and in some cases major ways. There are no lost books that should be in the Bible. A God that created the universe will ensure that his true Holy Word would not be corrupted therefore would make sure we had an uncorrupted version.
Once a true believer finds even one mistake or questionable verse is in the KJV then it will open the door to doubts that can lead to an unraveling of their confidence in the word of God. This secret is known to the Masons, Jesuits and Luciferians so that they thrive to convince the true believer of newly found scripture, modern day definition changes and so forth. We don’t correct the Bible the Bible corrects us.
Are those Alexandrian texts the same Alexandrian texts that have admitted omission’s by Origen the Ebionite (one who denies the doctrine of salvation), belived sin was forgiven by communion, denied that Christ was our high preist?
Why does 95% percent of all manuscript evidence support the text of the authorized Version?
All modern versions of the Bible today are based off of the work of Westcott and Hort!
I stopped trusting my own opinion long ago once I realized the humanistic and misguided education we are fed in the U.S. Its crap and designed literally to mislead the American student since Rockefeller infiltrated the school system back in 1915. The noose tightened up when the CFR was formed.
Now, King James, granted that there is much debate about the lifestyle of King James once one does research they will find the truth. Despite the consideration of both sides, there can be no doubt King James had an inner passion for the word of God. This is unlike the Vatican, Masons, Calvinist, Judaic, or Talmudic systems. So called Christian churches are pretty much gone. Most Pastors are masons, the Charismatic, Word Faith (TBN criminals); prosperity teaching and other such offshoots are heretical and will answer to Jesus when the judgment seat of Christ becomes a reality. Anyway, an excerpt from a letter to his eldest son, Prince Henry, he wrote,
“Diligently read his Word, and earnestly pray for the right understanding thereof. Search the scriptures, saith Christ, for they will bear testimony of Me. The whole scriptures, saith Paul, are profitable to teach, to improve, to correct, and to instruct in righteousness, that the man of God may be perfect unto all good work. “
James I also believed in “the divine right of Kings,” This I understand, is when a Monarch received his right to rule directly from God, and it was his own responsibility to rule according to the principles of the Bible, while at the same time making sure he paid attention to the good of his subjects. James I also had some objection to the marginal notes in the Geneva Bible which in my opinion, came from two reasons. One, the side notes were made by Puritans after John of Patmos, who made the LAST God inspired book of the Bible between 70-90 AD. Second, James I, saw many as bordering disloyal to the throne.
The translators were prepared by God no doubt. Spain failed to corrupt the English with the Jesuits poison, from Spain at this time. Spain actually attacked England for this reason. Actually in 1588 Spain sent an Armada to take England. They got their butts kicked by England and at that point England was saved from becoming Roman Catholic. The heretic Francis Bacon, masons, Priests, never touched the King James Bible. However, Satan around 1875 tried and succeeded in corrupting the King James by doing an end around. Meaning set up by the Vatican and Masons (Westcott and Hort), in setting the stage for the new versions. ALL OF THEM are crap. They are based on the Latin Vulgate. They convinced the committee that the old texts by Origen, Alexandrite were more reliable than the ones from Antioch. Isaiah 30: 1-3.
Isaiah 30 (King James Version)
Isaiah 30
1Woe to the rebellious children, saith the LORD, that take counsel, but not of me; and that cover with a covering, but not of my spirit, that they may add sin to sin:
2That walk to go down into Egypt, and have not asked at my mouth; to strengthen themselves in the strength of Pharaoh, and to trust in the shadow of Egypt!
3Therefore shall the strength of Pharaoh be your shame, and the trust in the shadow of Egypt your confusion.
The 47 or 48 translators were all men of God. They were actually 54 of the world’s more renowned Bible scholars and linguists of the day. Each had a solid grasp of Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic languages and each had written, translated and edited works in Greek. All were required to be Christian and a passion for the word of God. They also worked from about 15 rules for Translations laid out to ensure that the finished product was an absolute literal translation from the Hebrew and Greek of the original scriptures (Textus Receptus) into English. There were some printing errors discovered in the 17th and 18th century and revisions were made to correct these. They used the Massoretic Text for the Old Testament and for the New Testament the translations from Antioch. They rejected the heretical Roman Catholic Latin Vulgate and Rheims (1582) although it was used as reference to some extent it was not significant. They also rejected the Greek Septuagint (Bible of Alexandria, Egypt). Most Bible Colleges, professors who are in the Alexandrian cult are constantly altering the KJV with the Greek and English versions of the Roman Catholic Latin Vulgate Bible.
“Saint” Augustine, Jerome, Origen, Eusebius, Irenaeus not real “fathers”. Matthew, Mark, Luke, john, James, Jude, Peter, Paul real Early Church FATHERS
“1 Cor. 11:27 – Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.
28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.
29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord’s body.
30 For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep.”
The writings of the Septuagint copied the OT in parts by Origen, from his copies of the Greek Old Testament he obtained from the Vaudois that performed as missionaries from Antioch. Origen was a fraud and this is for sure. Origen was an unusual character. As you probably know, he was made head teacher at the School of Alexandria. He moved to Caesarea and in fact was caught in the Decian persecution of 250 AD and was tortured. He was released in 254 AD and died of his wounds. So, he wasn’t around during 100 AD sure. My reference to 100AD should have been the subject of the locations time period of the true manuscripts of the OT and NT of the copies of the original books of the Bible and copies of such maintained at Antioch by the Vaudois. They made perfect copies, even burning their work if even one mistake was made; starting over each time. The true men of God were very careful not to make any mistakes while transcribing.
Back to Origen, In his early years Origen was much too heretical to be counted as a Church Father. Times change you know. Today he is treated like a saint when in fact he was opposite in real life. Even Protestants have honored his writings but he was not a real Christian. Now he taught in these schools from 204 to 230 AD. He made counterfeit Bibles, him having a belief system similar to the Jehovah Witness concepts. After he had passed on, “scholars” copied his counterfeit Bibles. in the 4th century, after Constantine took Rome, by 325 AD they were asked to make 50 Bibles for Eusebius to take back to Rome of these corrupted Bibles. The scholars in Alexandria wrote three Biblical perversions. The Sinaiticus about 350 AD, the Vaticanus before 400 AD and the Alexandrinus about 450 AD. They disagree over 3,000 times in the 4 Gospels alone. That makes two streams of translations the northern Stream from Antioch and the southern stream in Alexandria, Egypt. The Norther Stream was God’s preserved word in Antioch of Syria and the Southern Stream God’s word perverted in Alexandria. So, behind the curtain was a new World language, and it was called Latin. So, the Vaudois moved to The Alps. These people called the Vaudois came from the Piedmont Valleys of the Alps, around the northwest corner in Italy, east of France. So of them got saved and went to Antioch to receive God’s word around 120 AD and that is where I was referring but somehow got my wires crossed or wrote out of context relative to Origen. In any case, God used these people to translate Gods word in Latin a world language like English is a worlds language today. Even if you get a position with the UN or OSCE today no matter where you are from you have to be fluent in the English Language. Well, in 120 AD there was an effort made to translate the works into Latin, finished around 157 AD. God’s word was available for the whole world and spread before 200 AD. It was called then the “Vulgate” or common Bible. So that is how Origen got a Copy of the Vulgate after 200 AD. The Early true church was heavily persecuted and the slaughter continued until Constantine took over after 313 AD leading to the Council of Nicea in 325 AD. Constantine was pagan but called himself Christian to win over the Christians. Rome, Mystery Babylon was forming. Constantine took the title Pontifex Maximus and there is more.
Concerning the Vulgate, make a long story shorter, old Jerome another intellectual like Origen, whose first works from 379 to 381 were simply his Latin translations of Origen’s writings. From 382 to 390 he worked to rewrite the true Old Latin Bible rejecting God’s preserved Old Latin. At first he just translated his Latin Bible from Origen’s Greek counterfeit , this so called Septuagint. Jerome even tried changing some words of Origen’s work and ticked off other scholars. Some even believed that the so called Septuagint was more pure than the Hebrew, can you imagine. Jerome finished is Latin perversion in 405 AD. it became known as the Latin Vulgate which was later to be REJECTED by King James. One of the reasons for the Gun Powder Plot by the Vatican to kill King James and stop his work.
So, going back to Origen. he made up an odd Greek Bible. He put together his own Greek OLD TESTAMENT, mixed with some old Folk tales called the Apocrypha and added his own perverted New Testament. It had to look like Jesus and the Apostles quoted from his Old Testament, making it look ‘ancient” but he added books as well. He passed on the Hebrew as a language less important but in reality he was not very well versed in Hebrew as he was in Greek. So, what Origen did was to put his Old Testament and the Apocrypha together and called them the “ancient Septuagint”……So, The Alexandrian Bible was folk tales from the Apocrypha and perverted new Testament. Some of the sources are “The Outline of History (1920), by H.G. Wells, pg 305, and quoted in “Final Authority” by Dr. William Grady (1993), Page 77, and Rev J. Tixeront, “A Handbook of Patrology” translated by S.A. Reamers, English Edition, 1920, Page 90. Also, in Awe of Thy Word” by Gail Riplinger (2003), page 676-677. chap 4. and Constantine info….Introduction to the History of Christianity, edited by Tim Dowley (1990), page 139.
The King James literally the only true translation based on scrolls and manuscripts. The KJV Is beyond the most accurate. It is according to God and History to prove out the ONLY word of God. It is the word of God spoken in the Bible itself. The changing of words now is not the rule. The changing of words in their current definition is not the rule but the corrupted versions. We have to study ourselves approved by using the definition of the word THEN and not now. The Changing of the definition to current definitions is not of God……The newer translations were purposely corrupted by two Freemasons named Westcott and Hort between 1870’s to 1890’s to set up all the newer versions. no exceptions exist.
———————————-
How the King James Bible Came to Be
https://time.com/4821911/king-james-bible-history